COVID-19 UPDATE: We are open! Our team is working and offering consultations via phone, e-mail, and video conferencing.

BCH Files Second Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Alleged Onewheel Nosedive Defect

Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC has filed another wrongful death lawsuit over alleged defects claimed to be associated with the Onewheel self-balancing electric transport device.

Our latest claim was filed on behalf of the family of a San Diego man who died from head injuries he sustained after being unexpectedly ejected from his Onewheel.

This is the second wrongful death lawsuit our firm has filed against Future Motion Inc., the manufacturer of the Onewheel and Onewheel XR. In May 2020, we filed a lawsuit for the family of a Texas man who suffered fatal brain injuries when his Onewheel is alleged to have abruptly shut off and nosedived.

About the Lawsuit: Claims of Serious Defects & Negligence

Our most recent lawsuit, filed in San Diego County Superior Court, claims the victim’s death allegedly resulted from serious defects and negligence on the part of Future Motion.

As noted in the lawsuit, the incident occurred when the victim had been riding his Onewheel XR around his neighborhood in Encinitas, California in August 2020. While riding, the victim’s Onewheel XR is alleged to have suddenly shut off and nosedived, throwing him forward to the ground. He suffered severe brain trauma and languished in a coma for nearly three weeks before succumbing to his injuries.

The lawsuit seeks compensation for the family’s pain and suffering, economic losses, and punitive damages. It raises similar allegations to those in our previously filed lawsuit, including claims that:

  1. Future Motion was allegedly negligent in designing, manufacturing, and marketing the Onewheel device.
  2. FM allegedly failed to warn consumers about risks associated with Onewheel.
  3. FM allegedly misled consumers into believing the Onewheel was safe for ordinary use.

Read more about the latest Onewheel wrongful death lawsuit here.

Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC has become a leader in litigating complex civil claims involving products liability and serious or fatal injuries. Our firm currently represents the families of two victims who died in Onewheel accidents due to what the plaintiffs claim are serious defects.

If you or someone you love has been hurt in a Onewheel accident involving an abrupt power shut-off, nosedive, or other problem associated with the Onewheel pushback feature, our attorneys are available to review your case and discuss your options for legal action. We offer FREE consultations and serve clients nationwide.

New Lawsuit Claims Onewheel “Nosedive” Responsible for San Diego Man’s Wrongful Death

A new lawsuit filed in san Diego County by Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC claims a defective Onewheel electric skateboard that unexpectedly shut down and nosedived caused an Encinitas man’s death.

Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC has filed a second products liability lawsuit against Future Motion, Inc. over claims that the company’s allegedly defective Onewheel transportation device caused the death of a San Diego man when it abruptly lost power and nosedived mid-ride.

The lawsuit, filed in San Diego County Superior Court, claims negligence on the part of Silicon Valley-based Future Motion and serious defects associated with its Onewheel device caused the victim’s death.

Bailey Cowan Heckaman raised similar claims in a wrongful death lawsuit filed against Future Motion in May 2020. That case, which was brought on behalf of the family of a Texas father who died from injuries allegedly sustained after his Onewheel unexpectedly lost power and nosedived, is currently pending.

Suit Claims Onewheel Defects Caused Encinitas Man’s Fatal Crash

According to court documents, the latest lawsuit stems from an accident in August 2020. The complaint states that the decedent had been riding his Onewheel XR around his Encinitas, California neighborhood when the device suddenly shut off and nosedived.

This allegedly caused the Onewheel board to “violently and unexpectedly” slam into the pavement and throw the decedent to the ground. The man suffered severe head trauma resulting in traumatic brain injury, hemorrhagic contusions, and skull fractures, among other injuries.

He was transported to Scripps Memorial Hospital in San Diego, where he languished in a coma for nearly three weeks before succumbing to his injuries.

Plaintiffs Say Defects with Onewheel “Pushback” Feature Can Lead to Nosedives

In its complaint, Plaintiffs allege that Future Motion was negligent in the design, manufacture, and marketing of its Onewheel device. The suit also brings claims of strict liability, failure to warn, and violations of the California Business & Professions Code for downplaying risks associated with the Onewheel and misleading consumers into believing it was safe for ordinary use.

These claims mirror those brought in BCH’s previous wrongful death action and concern alleged defects that make the Onewheel inherently dangerous. This includes the Onewheel’s ability to provide riders with a “pushback” sensation, which is allegedly designed to warn riders that they’re nearing the device’s limitations but instead can compromise the device’s ability to help the rider balance and lead to an unexpected shut off and nosedive. As the lawsuit claims:

“Once the motor’s resources reach a critical point, the motor’s normal ability to help the rider balance disappears, and the rider experiences an unexpected violent nosedive. Often, this will feel to the rider like the motor suddenly cut out or shut down.”

The lawsuit alleges that because Onewheel pushback can be influenced by factors such as rider weight, tire pressure, wind direction, rider stance, battery level, grade of incline or decline, and velocity, it is nearly impossible to predict when or what will cause a nosedive. This is allegedly true of velocity pushback, which can occur at speeds lower than the maximum due to the above factors, and pushback that can occur when riders are ascending or descending, which can be difficult for riders to discern from the feeling of natural resistance caused by an incline or decline. According to the lawsuit:

Not only is it prohibitively difficult to determine when nosedives/tailspins/shut-offs will occur, but the result of such unexpected, unpredictable and undiscernible events almost invariably cause the rider to be ejected or fall from the board, resulting in severe injuries or, as in this case, death. A Onewheel nosedive or shut-off is not a small event as it might be with any other type of vehicle. The front of the board violently slams into the ground and then the rider is inevitably thrown downward and forward, often leading with their heads.

BCH is continuing to investigate potential claims from victims who have suffered harm in Onewheel accidents due to abrupt power shut offs, nosedive, and other issues related to Onewheel pushback.

Bailey Cowan Heckaman is Houston-based trial practice that fights for victims and families nationwide in complex civil claims. Backed by top-rated attorneys, the firm has secured thousands of favorable results for clients in cases involving defective and dangerous products, serious injuries, and wrongful death. For more information, visit www.BCHLaw.com.

Categories